Modern Studies in Management and Organization

Modern Studies in Management and Organization

Governance with Adjectives: A Typology and Critical Evaluation of the Persian Literature on Islamic, Religious, Alavi, and Transcendent Governance

Document Type : Review Article | Persian

Author
Ph.D. in Public Administration, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/jmsmo.2026.594394.1053
Abstract
Purpose: This study critically evaluates the conceptualization mechanism in the Persian literature on qualified governance—a field that has faced a mass of overlapping terminology over the past two decades without offering researchers a conceptual map for orientation. The aim is not to reject or endorse the normative content of this literature but to methodologically evaluate its concept construction.
Methodology: This is a critical review within the framework of integrative reviews. The population comprised Persian scientific articles published between 2006 and 2025, selected through purposive theoretical sampling. The analysis tool was a seven-criterion framework based on Sartori, Goertz, and Gerring's criteria.
Findings: The identified terms fall into six conceptual families (text-oriented, discourse-oriented, philosophical-hikmi, civilizational-ideal, indigenous-national, and confrontational), with four dominant construction mechanisms (suffixation, juxtaposition, idealization, and confrontation). The seven-criterion evaluation shows moderate definitional clarity, weak differentiation from adjacent concepts and falsifiability, and a dual status in operationalization.
Conclusion: The root of dispersion in this field lies not merely in topic selection but in the mechanism of concept construction. A four-step framework for conceptual disciplining is proposed.
Keywords
Subjects

Article Title Persian

حکمرانی با صفت؛ گونه‌شناسی و ارزیابی انتقادی ادبیات فارسیِ حکمرانی اسلامی، دینی، علوی و متعالی

Author Persian

مهدی مهدویان صدر
دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.
Abstract Persian

هدف: این پژوهش به ارزیابی انتقادی سازوکار مفهوم‌سازی در ادبیات فارسی حکمرانی موصوف می‌پردازد؛ حوزه‌ای که در دو دهه اخیر با انبوهی از اصطلاحات هم‌پوشان روبه‌رو شده، بی‌آنکه نقشه‌ای مفهومی برای جهت‌یابی در اختیار پژوهشگران قرار گیرد. هدف، نه رد یا تأیید محتوای هنجاری این ادبیات، بلکه ارزیابی روش‌شناختی شیوه ساخت مفاهیم در آن است.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش از نوع مروری انتقادی و در چارچوب مرورهای یکپارچه‌ساز است. جامعه پژوهش، مقالات علمی فارسی منتشرشده بین ۱۳۸۵ تا ۱۴۰۴ بود که به‌صورت هدفمند و نظری نمونه‌گیری شدند. ابزار تحلیل، چارچوبی هفت‌معیاره مبتنی بر معیارهای سارتوری، گرتز و گرینگ بود.
یافته‌ها: اصطلاحات شناسایی‌شده در شش خانواده مفهومی (نص‌محور، گفتمان‌محور، حکمی-فلسفی، تمدنی-آرمانی، بومی-ملی و تقابلی) جای می‌گیرند و چهار سازوکار غالب مفهوم‌سازی (پسوندزنی، هم‌نشینی، آرمانی‌سازی و تقابل‌سازی) در آن‌ها قابل تشخیص است. ارزیابی هفت‌معیاره نشان می‌دهد این ادبیات در وضوح تعریفی وضعیت متوسط، در تمایز از مفاهیم همجوار و ابطال‌پذیری وضعیت ضعیف، و در عملیاتی‌شدن وضعیتی دوگانه دارد
نتیجه‌گیری: ریشه پراکندگی این حوزه، نه صرفاً در انتخاب موضوع، بلکه در سازوکار ساخت مفهوم است. چارچوبی چهارگامی برای انضباط‌بخشی مفهومی پیشنهاد می‌شود.

Keywords Persian

حکمرانی موصوف
مفهوم‌سازی
مرور انتقادی
ادبیات فارسی حکمرانی
ابطال‌پذیری
Abedi Darcheh, M., Zarei, B., Ahmadi, S. A., & Pishgahifard, Z. (2020). A comparative explanation of two approaches: Islamic transcendent governance and good governance. Researches of the Islamic Revolution, 9(34). [In Persian]
Aghapirouz, A. (2022). Foundations of the administrative system from the perspective of Islamic teachings. Islam and Management, 9(17), 221-246. https://doi.org/10.30471/im.2021.7712.1246 [In Persian]
Aghazadeh, H., & Mohebbi, A. (2023). A mechanism for formulating up-to-date governance strategies based on Islamic teachings. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Agricultural Sustainable Development, 10(3), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.22069/jead.2023.20602.1644 [In Persian]
Ahmadi, M. H. (2023). Politics and the problem of the technique of governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Transcendent Governance, 4(1), 67-86. [In Persian]
Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press.
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430-451. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0009
Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. (1993). Conceptual 'stretching' revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845-855. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818
Danaeefard, H. (2012). Designing a national observatory of policy and management lesson-drawing in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 4(4), 13-25. [In Persian]
Derakhshe, J., & Mousavinia, S. M. (2018). Components of good governance in the governing conduct of the Prophet of Islam. Researches of Science and Religion, 9(1), 1-28. [In Persian]
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
Gerring, J. (1999). What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357-393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246
Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user's guide. Princeton University Press.
Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 533-574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x
Heidari Haratmeh, M. (2024). Interpretive structural modeling of the components of good governance. New Researches in Islamic Governance, 1(1), 10-39. [In Persian]
Hejazifar, S. (2023). The nature and actors of Islamic governance based on the sayings of Imam Ali (AS). Islamic Management, 31(2), 87-127. [In Persian]
Javidi, R. (2022). The model and theory of the effectiveness of the Islamic state with a civilizational approach. Fundamental Studies of New Islamic Civilization, 5(1), 53-96. https://doi.org/10.22070/nic.2022.15510.1150 [In Persian]
Kalateh Qazi, A., & Torabi, A. (2021). Presenting a model of transcendent governance based on the model of Alavi governance. Transcendent Governance, 2(2), 59-88. [In Persian]
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
Ma'dani, J., & Najari, R. (2022). Exploring and explaining the components of sound Islamic governance in light of the pure values of the Islamic Revolution. Islamic Management, 30(3), 115-148. [In Persian]
Maknoon, R., Salimi, J., & Bahrami, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the pathology of development plans in Iran. Economic Strategy, 3(10), 137-167. [In Persian]
Malekitabar, E., Movahedi, M., Ghazanfari, M., & Moradian, M. (2022). Identifying and prioritizing the dimensions of governance from the perspective of Imam Khomeini. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 6(21), 279-296. [In Persian]
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Mirzaei, S. (2020). The story of science and technology governance in Iran. Transcendent Governance, 1(4), 103-118. [In Persian]
Mohammadi, H., Miri, M., Latifi, M., Mohtadi, M. M., & Bazargani, H. (2022). Designing a model for organizing revolutionary institutions in Islamic governance. Islamic Management, 30(3), 43-76. [In Persian]
Popper, K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge. (Original work published 1959)
Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2013). Looking like a state: Techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation. Journal of Development Studies, 49(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.709614
Qanadanzadeh, M. H., Ganjali, A., & Golchin, S. (2022). Exploring the dimensions of Alavi transcendence-oriented leadership based on Nahj al-Balagha. Islamic Management, 30(2), 63-103. [In Persian]
Rahnavard, F., Sanaeifar, M., Lesani Fesharaki, M. A., & Taherpour Kalantari, H. (2022). Dimensions and components of desirable governance in the Holy Quran. Islamic Management, 30(3), 11-41. [In Persian]
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
Salimi, J., & Maknoon, R. (2018). A qualitative meta-analysis of scientific research on the problem of governance in Iran. Public Administration, 10(1), 1-30. [In Persian]
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033-1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356
Seyed Tabatabaei, S. M., Latifi, M., Javanali Azar, M., & Bagheri, M. (2024). The school of Islamic public administration (1): Main assumptions and social and political foundations. Islamic Management, 32(4). [In Persian]
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
Zeinoddini, M. (2023). The charter of transformation in the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the thought of Imam Khamenei. Islamic Management, 31(3), 11-45. [In Persian]

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 17 September 2026

  • Receive Date 29 July 2026
  • Revise Date 28 August 2026
  • Accept Date 29 August 2026
  • Publish Date 17 September 2026